Counter-Intuitive Stability

 
 

Video 1. A typical free response on May 8

Early analysis suggested that, compared to the glider mode, the flapping mode should have a higher static margin, and thus has higher longitudinal stability. However, I never truly believe in this counter-intuitive prediction. Moreover, I used to think that flapping mode should also have low lateral stability.

To study the stability, I launched the ornithopter without implementing the tail controller. Surprisingly, 5 out of 6 glider mode tests ended up crashing in similar manners (Video 2):

The lateral stability was unable to counteract the poor single-hand-launch initial condition, thus the ornithopter yawed over to a huge side angle and lost speed. During the free fall, the glider-mode ornithopter regains its speed. However, with its poor longitudinal stability, it did not pitch up.

Video 2. All 6 glider mode tests on May 8 were such a failure that Arthur and I did not even export our temporary video recording. Here is a glider mode test on May 30 that shows a similar failure.

In comparison, 4 out of 8 flapping mode tests turned out to be successful flights. 2 of them even experienced stalling, then float in the air, then aggressively turned the nose down for over 90 degrees, and then start flying (Video 1).

 
 
Previous
Previous

Tail Kinematics

Next
Next

Circuit